Senator Crapo,

In this third message, we share with you how:

·        people can help themselves in the rural towns of Idaho and in the nation

 

·        the federal government can help the people

Note: for your convenience this message is at http://votingpeoplehelpingpeople.com/Crapo/senator_crapo_3.html

 

None of us had written a grant, before we submitted USDA-CSREES-SBIR-002363 .  We did the best we could, understanding that competition for these SBIR grants makes getting the grant one chance in 10 or 50 or so. 

Now we are starting on DE-FOA-0000161 , a DOE grant.

We are also trying to interest Doug Sayers, Premier Technology in building an ethanol facility in Salmon, as a model for the 10,000 communities nationwide that are similar.

Because rural communities, like Salmon, with mining and logging a past industry, we have unemployed and underemployed citizens, and we have young people leaving town to find work.  Rural communities (nearly all of Idaho) have a child poverty rate 20% or higher, according to a recent USDA report.   Economically disadvantaged students in 2007 in Lemhi County is 47%, according to School Data Direct.

Our idea can end this sad story.  With full production of fuel in Salmon, we add $28,955,050 to the local economy, $5,149,500 to household income, and 182 jobs in the town.  The $10.5 million that we send to oil companies will stay in the town and the so-called trickle-down process does the rest.

With local fuel production and use, the variation in cost of gasoline is eliminated. Rural communities will not have to pay whatever the price is at the gas pump. These communities will balance the cost of feed-stock production and fuel cost, to produce a stable price for fuel and a fair profit to the farmer.

This is how the people can help themselves and at the same time solve the energy, environment, and wage-productivity inequity.

 


 

Senator Crapo, here is what we are asking you to do:

 First Idea:

 

            ICM in Kansas has designed plants for corn ethanol.  We must use a different feedstock. ICM can show us how to:

  1. Capture the carbon dioxide from the fermentation

  2.  Use an external heat source for the distiller

  3. Configure the fermentation

  4.  Build the distiller

 Second Idea

Easy Energy Systems has a 1 million gallon per year (gpy) modular ethanol plant that costs $2,100,000 that can be the model for Salmon to show the state and the nation.  We need to obtain a 140’x40’ building with 20’ sidewalls ($450) , a heating system ($78K), and a cooling tower ($39K). 

The total is $2,667,000 for the second idea.

1.     It should reflect fiscal responsibility in use of federal funds.

Fewer people will be on unemployment and in need of other assistance from the government, when money for fuel is circulated in the town and not sent to oil companies, as it is now.

 

2.     It should add value to Idaho communities, critical research efforts, or to the general understanding of important issues and be consistent with Idaho priorities.

This project will enable a rural community to make the fuel that they use to replace the $10.5 million each year for gasoline.  A community of 8000, who makes their own fuel, will add $28,955,050 to the local economy, $5,149,500 to household income, and 182 jobs in the town. 

Salmon has had a lot of effort put into it to make it like other Idaho tourist towns. The lack of success has been because of its geographic location and because it has no attraction to make it a destination, such as a ski resort town has. The development of a self-sustaining economy, starting with transportation fuel will decrease the deterioration of our small economies and improve the impact on the environment nationwide.  When Salmon establishes itself as the birthplace of a truly self-sustaining all-around economy city, county, state and federal policy makers will use Salmon as the model of where our country needs to go.

 

3.     Federal assistance should be appropriate for the project.

 

All small towns pay tax that contributes to the tax incentives for fossil fuel.  This project is a way to return some of our taxes to the people who rarely see a significant return on the taxes we pay.

What better way to advance the nation beyond the politics that this project addresses than to financially support the necessary change in how we support all of America’s needs in one project.

 

 

4.     It should provide a national benefit or be consistent with ongoing national efforts.

Every town in the nation can make their own fuel. Every town can combat poverty, unemployment, global warming and nutritious food issues causing excessive healthcare costs, all by producing their own transportation fuel.

 

 

Project Name: Rural Towns Make Their Own Fuel

Amount Requested: $6,500,000

Recipient: Commander Chassis

Location: Salmon

Public Interest: Helps small towns in Idaho to be energy independent.

Description: A community of 8000, who spends $10.5 million on gasoline each year now, will add $28,955,050 to the local economy, $5,149,500 to household income, and 182 jobs in the town.  The biomass conversion bio-refinery that we innovate will convert sugar beets into ethanol. 

 

Senator Crapo:

In the USA, 5,440 towns use 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 gallons of gasoline.  Easy Energy Systems’ 1-10 million facilities can serve 5,440 towns.  These data from:

http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/files/SUB-EST2007-IP.csv

Consider $3.00 per gallon for gasoline.  That means $3.00 x 1,000,000 = $3 million and $3.00 x 10,000,000 = $30,000,000 is money spent by the lowest and highest population towns.  These 5,440 towns spent $53,219,354,760 on gasoline in 2007.  That is $53 billion of the $413,481,307,500 spent on gasoline nationwide.  That is about 13% of the money that is spent nationwide, which is spent in these 5,440 towns for gasoline.  Assume a profit of 1%.  The profit for these towns is $5.3 billion.

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_prim_dcu_nus_a.htm

These towns in Idaho spent $1,357,362,552

Kansas towns spent $3,008,760,300